🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, the game developers launched a fresh game mode called Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this mode resembles the regular Breakthrough setup but features several key changes:

• Each team has just eight human participants, with the rest made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions done by human gamers award full XP, while AI activities offer reduced XP.
• Just a pair of maps are available: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Elements like Dogtags, accolades, and career stat updates are disabled.

So essentially, this mode lives up to its title: it's a casual take of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it provides more options for gamers seeking alternative ways to enjoy the game. But, gaming history has shown one thing, it's that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, many Battlefield 6 players are upset.

Player Reactions: Anger to Support

"People want real players. Don't repeat the mistakes of your rivals," states one reply to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," says a different user. At the same time, in community forums, one user notes, "I have no idea where we are going with this title," while someone else lists everything they believe to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

However, for every complaint, there are players sharing how much they're enjoying the new mode. "It's enjoyable to warm up, real players prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," says a forum post. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are gamers who actually go outside and can't play this title 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," states another. A response via social media explains that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is great for me," and another applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Criticisms and Community Feedback

All that said, players have constructive reasons to criticize Casual Breakthrough. Some users have pointed out that it could increase wait times more extended for different playlists because of the sheer number of options in the game already. On a similar note, certain regions already encounter mostly bots in the current modes. It also seems a little backwards that the mode won't start without a minimum number of human gamers, even though it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Finally, one of the biggest grievances is that a previous feature was meant to provide full XP, even against bots, but that was removed when they tried to eliminate XP farming from the system. Thus Casual Breakthrough seems like the community compromising in the middle, according to forum feedback. A different user describes this addition as the devs "dropping the ball so hard, I experienced so much fun in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Be Made?

If the development team has demonstrated something so far with the latest installment, it is that they're paying attention and responding to player input. Tasks that were overly hard got fixed very quickly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, should analytics shows this recent mode isn't performing to their standards, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.