🔗 Share this article

During the previous race for the White House, the former president courted the electorate with promises to reduce costs starting on day one. But, after he assumed office, there was minimal focus to affordability issues. This shifted following price-fatigued voters expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Within days, his team initiated a hastily assembled campaign to address living costs. Unfortunately, the drive has proven a hot mess—filled with illogical claims, inconsistencies, unrealistic expectations, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Out-of-Touch Assertions and Supermarket Truth

Merely 48 hours post-election, Trump began his affordability drive with a poorly received remark: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” This comment from billionaire Trump—often mingles with fellow billionaires—demonstrated utter contempt for everyday citizens facing difficulties when visiting supermarkets. Essentially, he dismissed their concerns as trivial, suggesting they had it wrong about actual costs.

This statement that everything was “way down” was absurdly obtuse and inaccurate. How could all costs be decreasing when the taxes he imposed were pushing up prices? Recent data show banana prices increased nearly 7% in the last twelve months, the price of beef climbed 14.7%, and coffee prices surged by nearly 19%—partly due to punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. Between January and September, prices rose in the majority of food categories monitored by the government’s price index, including meats, poultry, and fish (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (up 2.8%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Contradictions and Falsehoods in Economic Claims

In spite of these numbers, Trump continues to push his big lie about affordability. After the vote, he has stated there is “virtually no inflation,” insisted “prices are way down,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” These statements ignore the fact that general costs have clearly increased after the previous administration. Currently, inflation is at a 3% annual rate, which is half again as much than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. In another falsehood, he boasted that fuel costs had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, despite government figures indicate they average over three dollars.

Faced with reality and declining opinion polls, some Trump aides apparently cautioned that his “prices are down” rhetoric made him sound disconnected from ordinary people. A lot of voters are frustrated about prices continuing to climb following promises of reductions. In response, advisers suggested one quick fix: reduce certain import taxes. The logical move contradicted the president’s unrealistic claim that additional taxes wouldn’t raise prices for American shoppers.

Suggested Solutions and Their Possible Impact

With some tariffs reduced on several food items, the administration will likely announce that he has lowered costs once those foods start declining in price. That would be like an arsonist taking credit for extinguishing a fire that he ignited. In another instance, while speaking fast-food leaders, Trump declared that “this is the golden age of America” and told the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” Such statements come naturally for a billionaire to make, but they ring hollow to countless households who are struggling—especially when many face losing food stamps or rising insurance costs.

Per a survey conducted last fall, three-quarters of respondents believe economic conditions are mediocre or bad, while only 26% rate them good or excellent. A separate survey found that a majority of citizens feel the administration’s actions have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Economic Truth and Suggested Measures

Scott Bessent, Trump’s top economic official, recently contradicted claims of a prosperous era. He noted that instead of thriving, certain sectors of the American economy “have contracted.” Industrial production—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and lost around tens of thousands of positions this year. Pointing to this weakness, the secretary urged the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates—a move that could help affordability.

In response to widespread concern about living costs, the president proposed a direct payment of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” For many households in need, this sounds like manna from heaven, but the prospects are dim that lawmakers—already alarmed about huge budget deficits—will enact the proposal. This idea would likely increase federal spending, push up borrowing costs, and possibly drive prices higher by putting more money into consumers’ pockets.

Another supposed fix for cost issues involved introducing 50-year mortgages, with the notion that this would reduce monthly mortgage payments. But, the truth is that such lengthy loans have minimal impact to reduce installments—often cutting them by a small amount per month. The drawback is that these mortgages could more than double the overall cost borrowers pay and slow their accumulation of equity.

Blaming the Previous Administration and Financial Outlook

As part of their cost-cutting effort, Trump and his team have again pointed fingers at the previous president for economic problems, including increasing costs. Spokespeople stated they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” These are absurd and inaccurate claims. In reality, Biden left a strong economy, with low price growth, solid expansion, and unemployment low. However, Trump’s policies—particularly his tariffs—have created an difficult situation, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

Per Mark Zandi, lead analyst at a research firm, 22 states are already in recession, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. He fears that if key regions such as major economies tumble into recession, the nation could face a widespread recession. During recessions, people generally possess reduced funds to spend, and price increases often falls. Sadly, given Trump’s much-ballyhooed affordability campaign likely to do little to control costs, his primary method for achieving increased affordability might prove to be pushing the nation into recession—a scenario that hard-pressed households really can’t afford.