🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.